Spotlight Report

Tumor of the Month

Business News

Research Highlights

Clinical Development

Biomarkers

Regulatory

Feedback

Previous Issue PDFs

 

Frontpage>Jump to Smartanalyst.com>Print-Friendly PDF
 

AstraZeneca Discontinues Olaparib Development Programme in Ovarian Cancer
 

AstraZeneca announced that its investigational compound olaparib will not progress into Phase III development for the maintenance treatment of serous ovarian cancer. Olaparib is an oral PARP inhibitor that exploits DNA repair pathways to preferentially kill cancer cells.

The decision to discontinue olaparib’s development in serous ovarian cancer was made following a review of an interim analysis of a Phase II study (Study 19), which indicated that the previously reported PFS benefit is unlikely to translate into an OS benefit, the definitive measure of patient benefit in ovarian cancer. In addition, attempts to identify a suitable tablet dose for use in Phase III studies have not been successful. No new safety concerns were identified for patients.
 
Source: AstraZeneca

Phase III BRISK-PS Study with Brivanib did not Meet Primary Endpoint in HCC Patients

BMS reported that the Phase III BRISK-PS (Brivanib Study in HCC Patients at Risk Post Sorafenib) clinical trial in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who failed or are intolerant to sorafenib did not meet the primary endpoint of improving OS vs. placebo. Brivanib inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR).

BRISK-PS is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study of the investigational agent brivanib plus BSC vs. placebo plus BSC in HCC patients who have progressed on sorafenib. The BRISK-PS study is one of four Phase III clinical trials evaluating brivanib in different HCC patient populations. These ongoing Phase III studies continue as planned.
 
Source: BMS

Tivozanib Successfully Demonstrated PFS Superiority over Sorafenib in RCC Patients in Phase III TIVO-1 Trial
 

Aveo and Astellas Pharma announced that tivozanib demonstrated superiority over sorafenib in the primary endpoint of PFS in TIVO-1, a global, randomized, Phase III clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of investigational drug tivozanib compared with sorafenib in 517 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). TIVO-1 is the first registration study in first-line RCC that is comparing an investigational agent against an approved VEGF therapy. All patients in TIVO-1 had clear cell RCC, had undergone a prior nephrectomy, and had not previously been treated with either a VEGF or an mTOR therapy.

Based on the topline analysis of events in TIVO-1, determined by a blinded, independent review committee, tivozanib demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in PFS with a median PFS of 11.9 months compared with a median PFS of 9.1 months for sorafenib in the overall study population. Tivozanib demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in PFS with a median PFS of 12.7 months compared with a median PFS of 9.1 months for sorafenib in the pre-specified subpopulation of patients who were treatment-naive (no prior systemic anti-cancer therapy); this subpopulation was ~70% of the total study population. Tivozanib demonstrated a well-tolerated safety profile consistent with the Phase II experience; the most commonly reported side effect was hypertension, a well-established on-target and manageable effect of VEGFR inhibitors.

Source: Aveo

 

Frontpage>Jump to Smartanalyst.com>Print-Friendly PDF